Results

Overview

Along with an increased stand altert, perching and dust bathing behaviour, the enrichment group were found to spend more time in proximity to the novel object than the control group. They also had less amount of fault bars in their feathers than the control group had. The other tests did not show any significant differences.

Details

Ethological study

A significant difference between the treatments were found in the following behaviours:

Stand alert
The enrichment group performed the behaviour more than the control group (P=0.040)

Perch
The enrichment group performed the behaviour more than the control group (P=0.008)

Dust bathe
The enrichment group performed the behaviour more than the control group (P=0.001)

No significant differences were found regading the other behaviours.

Difference between the treatments in regard of dust bathing behaviour. ***P<0.001
Open field test

There was so significance between the treatments regarding the amount of zone crossings (P=0.138).

Difference between the treatments in the number of zone crossings.
Novel object test

There was a significant difference between the treatments in terms of the amount spent remote of the novel object, where the enrichment group spent less time remote of the object than the control group (P=0.048).

Difference between the treatments in proximity and remoteness of the novel object. *P<0.05
Restraint test

There was no difference between treatments regarding the amount of CORT-levels in the plasma (P=0.587). However, there was a difference between before and after restraint, where the amount increased significantly after the test (P=<0.001).

Difference between the treatments in CORT-concentration. ***P<0.001
Fault bars analysis

A significant difference was found between the treatments, where the control group had more fault bars than the enrichment group (P=0.003).

Example of how a fault bar can look like
Difference between the treatments in the number of fault bars. **P<0.01